Overloop
EU-hosted AI outbound for email and LinkedIn
- Pricingfrom $69 · per user / month (250 credits)
- Safety Score66/100 · elevated risk signals
- LinkedIn-PolicyNot officially authorised
- Free trialNo
- Rating★ 4.4 (130)
- IntegrationsHubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Zapier, Slack
- Top strengthThe category's only EU vendor: Brussels company with a published VAT ID, EU hosting and a documented DPA
- Watch outAutomates the full outbound loop including LinkedIn: not authorised under LinkedIn's policies
What Overloop does
EU-hosted AI outbound for email and LinkedIn. Bluebench rates Overloop with a Safety Score of 66 based on five dimensions (compliance, data privacy, sender reputation, transparency, support). The breakdown below covers what the tool does well and where to be cautious.
The Bluebench review
Overloop positions itself primarily around ai-sdr. Its Safety Score of 66/100 is based on the tool's architecture, public evidence and vendor documentation, not on paid placement: An EU company, EU hosting and a documented DPA are unique in this category and carry the privacy value; full automation of the LinkedIn channel and the opaque sourcing of the 450M contact database prevent more. Assessed via desk research, no hands-on test yet. Strengths: the category's only eu vendor: brussels company with a published vat id, eu hosting and a documented dpa and the category's cheapest entry ($69/user) with clear public pricing. Weaknesses: automates the full outbound loop including linkedin: not authorised under linkedin's policies.
Proceed with caution. Validate account risk and lock-in before buying. Important: the underlying automation is not authorised under LinkedIn's policies.
Pros & cons
Pros
- The category's only EU vendor: Brussels company with a published VAT ID, EU hosting and a documented DPA
- The category's cheapest entry ($69/user) with clear public pricing
Cons
- Automates the full outbound loop including LinkedIn: not authorised under LinkedIn's policies
- Built-in 450M contact database whose sourcing and GDPR basis are as opaque as US competitors'
Rating & methodology
The Safety Score is reviewed editorially on an ongoing basis. We evaluate architecture, documented compliance and privacy evidence, and publicly reported suspensions.
Verified vendor primary sources: the basis of the editorial assessment.
